Non-invasive cell-free DNA-based approach for the diagnosis of clinical miscarriage: A retrospective study.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate cell-free DNA (cfDNA) testing as a non-invasive approach to detecting aneuploidies in clinical miscarriages. DESIGN: A retrospective cohort study of women with pregnancy loss. SETTING: Hospitals and genetic analysis laboratories. POPULATION OR SAMPLE: Pregnancy losses in the period 2021-2022. METHODS: Results derived from non-invasive cfDNA testing (Veriseq NIPT Solution V2) of maternal blood and invasive analysis of products of conception (POC) (Ion ReproSeq) compared in 120 women who suffered a miscarriage. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Concordance rate results, cfDNA testing performance, non-informative rate (NIR) and fetal fraction (FF). RESULTS: We found no significant differences in the NIR between invasive (iPOC) and non-invasive (niPOC) analysis of POC (10.0% [12/120] versus 16.7% [20/120]). Of 120 samples, 90 provided an informative result in iPOC and niPOC groups (75%). cfDNA analysis correctly identified 74/87 (85.1%) samples (excluding triploidies). Sensitivity and specificity were 79.4% and 100%, respectively; all discordant cases were female. A binomial logistic model suggested fetal sex as the only variable influencing the concordance rate (P = 0.035). A Y-chromosome-based FF estimate allowed the optimal reclassification of cfDNA of non-informative male fetuses and a more accurate evaluation of cfDNA testing performance. The difference between the two FF estimates (native algorithm and Y-chromosome-based) suggests that female non-concordant cases may represent non-informative cases. CONCLUSIONS: Cell-free DNA-based testing provides a non-invasive approach to determining the genetic cause of clinical miscarriage.

Inherited unbalanced reciprocal translocation with 3q duplication and 5p deletion in a foetus revealed by cell-free foetal DNA (cffDNA) testing: a case report.

BACKGROUND: Since 2011, screening maternal blood for cell-free foetal DNA (cffDNA) fragments has offered a robust clinical tool to classify pregnancy as low or high-risk for Down, Edwards, and Patau syndromes. With recent advances in molecular biology and improvements in data analysis algorithms, the screening's scope of analysis continues to expand. Indeed, screening now encompassess additional conditions, including aneuploidies for sex chromosomes, microdeletions and microduplications, rare autosomal trisomies, and, more recently, segmental deletions and duplications called copy number variations (CNVs). Yet, the ability to detect CNVs creates a new challenge for cffDNA analysis in couples in which one member carries a structural rearrangement such as a translocation or inversion. CASE PRESENTATION: We report a segmental duplication of the long arm of chromosome 3 and a segmental deletion of the short arm of chromosome 5 detected by cffDNA analysis in a 25-year-old pregnant woman. The blood sample was sequenced on a NextSeq 550 (Illumina) using the VeriSeq NIPT Solution v1 assay. G-band karyotyping in amniotic fluid only detected an abnormality in chromosome 5. Next-generation sequencing in amniocytes confirmed both abnormalities and identified breakpoints in 3q26.32q29 and 5p13.3p15. The foetus died at 21 weeks of gestation due to multiple abnormalities, and later G-band karyotyping in the parents revealed that the father was a carrier of a balanced reciprocal translocation [46,XY,t(3;5)(q26.2;p13)]. Maternal karyotype appeared normal. CONCLUSION: This case provides evidence that extended cffDNA can detect, in addition to aneuploidies for whole chromosomes, large segmental aneuploidies. In some cases, this may indicate the presence of chromosomal rearrangements in a parent. Such abnormalities are outside the scope of standard cffDNA analysis targeting chromosomes 13, 18, 21, X, and Y, potentially leading to undiagnosed congenital conditions.

Characteristics of the IVF Cycle that Contribute to the Incidence of Mosaicism.

Highly sensitive next-generation sequencing (NGS) platforms applied to preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy (PGT-A) allow the classification of mosaicism in trophectoderm biopsies. However, the incidence of mosaicism reported by these tests can be affected by a wide number of analytical, biological, and clinical factors. With the use of a proprietary algorithm for automated diagnosis of aneuploidy and mosaicism, we retrospectively analyzed a large series of 115,368 trophectoderm biopsies from 27,436 PGT-A cycles to determine whether certain biological factors and in vitro fertilization (IVF) practices influence the incidence of overall aneuploidy, whole uniform aneuploidy, mosaicism, and TE biopsies with only segmental aneuploidy. Older female and male patients showed higher rates of high-mosaic degree and whole uniform aneuploidies and severe oligozoospermic patients had higher rates of mosaicism and only segmental aneuploidies. Logistic regression analysis identified a positive effect of female age but a negative effect of embryo vitrification on the incidence of overall aneuploid embryos. Female age increased whole uniform aneuploidy rates but decreased only segmental aneuploidy and mosaicism, mainly low-mosaics. Conversely, higher ovarian response decreased whole uniform aneuploidy rates but increased only segmental aneuploidies. Finally, embryo vitrification decreased whole uniform aneuploidy rates but increased mosaicism, mainly low-mosaics, compared to PGT-A cycles with fresh oocytes. These results could be useful for clinician's management of the IVF cycles.

Sperm chromosomal abnormalities and their contribution to human embryo aneuploidy.

In this work we reviewed 18 years of experience using fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) for sperm aneuploidy testing. We evaluated parameters associated with increased numerical sperm chromosome abnormalities and determined the male contribution to embryo aneploidies in terms of reproductive outcome by increased sperm aneuploidy. This retrospective study analyzed data from 2008 sperm samples of infertile males undergoing FISH analysis because of clinical history of repetitive implantation failure, recurrent miscarriage, impaired sperm parameters, or mixed causes. Sperm concentration was the only sperm parameter associated with FISH results-we observed a gradual increase of abnormal sperm FISH results in males with decreasing sperm concentration. However, a great proportion of normozoospermic males also showed increased sperm aneuploidies, suggesting that sperm parameters alone do not enable identification of a substantial proportion of infertile males at risk of sperm aneuploidies. Regarding reproductive outcomes, couples with normal sperm FISH results for the male had similar outcomes regardless of conventional in vitro fertilization (IVF), intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI), or preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidies (PGT-A). However, couples with abnormal sperm FISH results for the male showed better clinical outcomes after PGT-A, suggesting a potential contribution of sperm to embryo aneuploidy. Moreover, PGT-A cycles showed better clinical outcomes when 24 chromosomes were analyzed by array comparative genome hybridization (aCGH) or next-generation sequencing (NGS) instead of only nine chromosomes analyzed by FISH. In conclusion, sperm FISH analysis offers clinical prognostic value to evaluate reproductive possibilities in infertile couples. Therefore, couples with abnormal sperm FISH results should be offered genetic counseling and presented with clinical options such as PGT-A.

Clinical application of embryo aneuploidy testing by next-generation sequencing.

We review here the evolution in the field of embryo aneuploidy testing over the last 20 years, from the analysis of a subset of chromosomes by fluorescence in situ hybridisation to the transition toward a more comprehensive analysis of all 24 chromosomes. This current comprehensive aneuploidy testing most commonly employs next-generation sequencing (NGS). We present our experience in over 130 000 embryo biopsies using this technology. The incidence of aneuploidy was lower in trophectoderm biopsies compared to cleavage-stage biopsies. We also confirmed by NGS that embryo aneuploidy rates increased with increasing maternal age, mostly attributable to an increase in complex aneuploid embryos. In contrast, the number of MII oocytes retrieved or the use of oocyte vitrification did not affect aneuploidy rates. Similarly, neither maternal age, oocyte number, nor oocyte vitrification affected the incidence of mosaicism. Analysis of clinical outcomes, indications, and potential benefits of embryo aneuploidy testing revealed advanced maternal age as the most favored group, with some evidence of improved delivery rate per transfer as well as decreased miscarriage rates and time to pregnancy. Other indications are: recurrent miscarriage, repetitive implantation failure, severe male factor, previous trisomic pregnancy, and good prognosis patients mainly undergoing single embryo transfer, with the latter indication used to reduce the occurrence of multiple pregnancies without compromising cycle outcome. In conclusion, NGS has become the most appropriate technology for aneuploidy testing in trophectoderm biopsies, with accurate results, high throughput, and cost efficiency. This technology can be also applied to the analysis of the embryonic cell free DNA released to the culture media at blastocyst stage. This is a promising approach towards a non-invasive preimplantation genetic testing of aneuploidy.

Molecular analysis of products of conception obtained by hysteroembryoscopy from infertile couples.

PURPOSE: To analyze the molecular cytogenetic data obtained from products of conception (POC) obtained by selective biopsy of first trimester miscarriages and to estimate the rate of chromosomal anomalies in miscarriages from pregnancies achieved by natural conception (NC) or by assisted reproductive technology (ART) interventions. METHODS: We used KaryoLite™ BoBs™ (PerkinElmer LAS, Wallac, Turku, Finland) technology to analyze 189 samples from ART or NC pregnancies. RESULTS: All POC were successfully evaluated. A higher incidence of chromosomal abnormalities was observed in POC after ART using the patient's own oocytes than from NC pregnancies (62.7% vs. 40.6%; p < 0.05). The lowest incidence of chromosomal abnormalities was observed in POCs ART using donor eggs from women younger than 35 years (12.8%). No statistical differences in the percentage of abnormal miscarriages were observed in correlation with sperm concentration: a sperm concentration less than 5 million/mL produced 75% abnormal results and a concentration higher than 5 million/mL produced 51%. CONCLUSIONS: POC analysis is essential to determine the cause of pregnancy loss. Using culture-independent molecular biology techniques to analyze POCs avoids limitations such as growth failure and reduces the time required for analysis. Selective biopsy of fetal tissue by hysteroembryoscopy avoids the risk of misdiagnosis due to maternal cell contamination. Our results show that maternal age, sperm quality, and ART-assisted pregnancies are risk factors for abnormal gestations.

New tools for embryo selection: comprehensive chromosome screening by array comparative genomic hybridization.

The objective of this study was to evaluate the usefulness of comprehensive chromosome screening (CCS) using array comparative genomic hybridization (aCGH). The study included 1420 CCS cycles for recurrent miscarriage (n = 203); repetitive implantation failure (n = 188); severe male factor (n = 116); previous trisomic pregnancy (n = 33); and advanced maternal age (n = 880). CCS was performed in cycles with fresh oocytes and embryos (n = 774); mixed cycles with fresh and vitrified oocytes (n = 320); mixed cycles with fresh and vitrified day-2 embryos (n = 235); and mixed cycles with fresh and vitrified day-3 embryos (n = 91). Day-3 embryo biopsy was performed and analyzed by aCGH followed by day-5 embryo transfer. Consistent implantation (range: 40.5-54.2%) and pregnancy rates per transfer (range: 46.0-62.9%) were obtained for all the indications and independently of the origin of the oocytes or embryos. However, a lower delivery rate per cycle was achieved in women aged over 40 years (18.1%) due to the higher percentage of aneuploid embryos (85.3%) and lower number of cycles with at least one euploid embryo available per transfer (40.3%). We concluded that aneuploidy is one of the major factors which affect embryo implantation.

BACs-on-Beads technology: a reliable test for rapid detection of aneuploidies and microdeletions in prenatal diagnosis.

The risk of fetal aneuploidies is usually estimated based on high resolution ultrasound combined with biochemical determination of criterion in maternal blood, with invasive procedures offered to the population at risk. The purpose of this study was to investigate the effectiveness of a new rapid aneuploidy screening test on amniotic fluid (AF) or chorionic villus (CV) samples based on BACs-on-Beads (BoBs) technology and to compare the results with classical karyotyping by Giemsa banding (G-banding) of cultured cells in metaphase as the gold standard technique. The prenatal-BoBs kit was used to study aneuploidies involving chromosomes 13, 18, 21, X, and Y as well as nine microdeletion syndromes in 321 AF and 43 CV samples. G-banding of metaphase cultured cells was performed concomitantly for all prenatal samples. A microarray-based comparative genomic hybridization (aCGH) was also carried out in a subset of samples. Prenatal-BoBs results were widely confirmed by classical karyotyping. Only six karyotype findings were not identified by Prenatal-BoBs, all of them due to the known limitations of the technique. In summary, the BACs-on-Beads technology was an accurate, robust, and efficient method for the rapid diagnosis of common aneuploidies and microdeletion syndromes in prenatal samples.

Use of array comparative genomic hybridization (array-CGH) for embryo assessment: clinical results.

OBJECTIVE: To review clinical outcomes after preimplantation genetic screening. Most methods of embryo viability assessment involve morphologic evaluation at different preimplantation developmental stages. A weak association between blastocyst morphology and aneuploidy has been described, supporting the basis for preimplantation genetic screening (PGS) for assessment of embryo viability. The expected improvement in reproductive outcome rates has been reached with the application of microarrays based on comparative genomic hybridization (CGH) in clinical routine PGS. DESIGN: Review of published studies and own unpublished data. SETTING: University-affiliated private institution. PATIENT(S): IVF patients undergoing PGS at different stages. INTERVENTION(S): PGS with polar body, cleavage-stage, and blastocyst biopsies. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Aneuploidy, implantation, and pregnancy rates. RESULTS: The clinical outcome after analysis of all 24 chromosomes improved pregnancy and implantation rates for different indications to a higher degree than the previously available technology, fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH), in which only a limited number of chromosomes could be analyzed. CONCLUSION(S): Most of the data regarding the controversy of day-3 biopsy come from FISH cycles, and the utility of day-3 biopsy with new array-CGH technology should be further evaluated through randomized controlled trials. The current trend is blastocyst biopsy with a fresh transfer or vitrification for transfer in a nonstimulated cycle.

Tecnología BACs-on-Beads™ aplicada al diagnóstico prenatal y al estudio citogenético de restos abortivos / BACs-on-Beads™ technology applied to prenatal diagnosis and the cytogenetic study of abortion remains

La tecnología de BACs-on-Beads utiliza sondas de ADN procedentes de Cromosomas Artificiales Bacterianos o BAC fijados en microesferas Luminex®. La muestra marcada y los ADN de referencia marcados se hibridan respectivamente con las mismas sondas BoBsTM complementarias. Después de la hibridación se leen las intensidades de la señal mediante el sistema instrumental Luminex® 100/200. Se puede aplicar al diagnóstico prenatal rápido con un kit diseñado para descartar aneuploidías para los cromosomas 13, 18, 21 y los cromosomas sexuales así como ganancias y pérdidas de ADN asociadas con 9 síndromes de microdeleción como son: Síndrome de DiGeorge, Síndrome de Williams-Beuren, Síndrome de Prader-Willi, Síndrome de Angelman, Síndrome de Smith-Magenis, Síndrome de Wolf-Hirschhorn, Síndrome de Cri du Chat, Síndrome de Langer-Giedion, y Síndrome de Miller-Dieker. Basados en esta misma tecnología se ha desarrollado un kit llamado KaryoLite-BoBsTM, que permite descartar aneuploidías para los 24 cromosomas y que se puede aplicar al estudio de alteraciones cromosómicas numéricas en restos abortivos. En este trabajo se presentan los resultados de nuestro grupo tras la aplicación de la tecnología de BAC-on-BeadsTM en 332 muestras de líquido amniótico, 48 muestras de vellosidades coriales y en el estudio de aneuploidías en 71 muestras de restos abortivos(AU)

BACs-on-Beads (BoBs) technology is based on DNA sequences from Bacterial Artificial Chromosomes fixed in Luminex® microspheres. The study sample and the reference DNA are labeled with similar but complementary BoBsTM probes. After the hybridisation, signal intensities were analysed using the Luminex® 100/200 instrumental system. This technology has been applied to rapid prenatal diagnosis with a kit designed to analyse aneuploidy for chromosomes 13, 18, 21 and sex chromosomes, and a panel of 9 microdeletion syndromes: DiGeorge, Williams-Beuren, Prader-Willi, Angelman, Smith-Magenis, Wolf-Hirschhorn, Cri du Chat, Langer-Giedion, and Miller-Dieker syndrome. Based on a similar technology, KaryoLite-BoBsTM kit allows the identification of aneuploidy for all 24 chromosomes, and can be applied to the analysis of products of conception, among other possibilities. In this study we present our current experience in the application of BAC-on-BeadsTM technology in 332 amniotic fluid samples; 48 chorionic villus samples and 71 samples from products of conception(AU)